by K.T. Weaver, SkyVision Solutions
In order to penalize consumers who do not wish to take on the additional safety and security risks associated with smart meters, utilities typically charge those customers punitive fees. They justify or rationalize these fees by proclaiming that other customers should not subsidize the few consumers refusing smart meters.
In actuality, those customers refusing smart meter risks are simply requesting a “same level of service” with a traditional analog meter. Logically, in those circumstances, why should there be any change in how the customer is billed for electric service?
Additionally, however, even while a customer is paying a punitive fee for a smart meter refusal, they nearly always are also paying for the infrastructure costs associated with having a smart meter, even though they don’t have a smart meter. Does that seem “fair”, i.e., being charged twice? This issue was discussed at the March 14, 2017, Michigan House Energy Policy meeting chaired by Representative Gary Glenn. Highlights from that meeting are provided below.
Read the rest of the article at smartgridawareness.org