Firefighter’s Against Time of Use Billing

by Brian Thiesen

Screen shot 2013-07-24 at 2.34.52 AM

Time of Use (TOU) Billing… a.k.a. Profit Maximization Billing, is when Utilities will charge more or less depending on what time you use power. Utilities know that the majority of your power will be used at certain times. Examples are 6 am – 10 am and 3 pm to 7 pm.  Of course they are about the money and so because you use the most power at this time, they will charge you more.

The con is to make you believe this is to ‘handle loads’ or of course the ever popular green washing ‘energy conservation’ (which of course has shown meters save no energy for consumers AND it costs more in the end to power the smart grid).

The irony on ‘load handling’ is we are all supposed to get smart appliances which works out well for the ‘green’ side since we should throw out perfectly good appliances for new ones that last half the time (but hey you can set your washer 500 different ways now although this does not change the quality of wash but the beeps and lights keep the babies entertained and the techies happy).

Read the full article here

 

 

Business Case Argument to Seattle City Council 2016

Seattle City Light Business Case from November 2014. (Business Case Analysis focused on Build or Buy options  – they decided to choose a 3rd Party Hosted Solution (not on consumer value, conservation, or environment).SCL-Business Case Update Report_V4 – 20160426 City Light
“Getting Smarter About the Smart Grid.”  “Why are federal stimulus programs underwriting billions of dollars of ‘dumb’ smart meters for utility companies – with taxpayer dollars – meters that will soon be obsolete and not integrate with, or enable, the ‘smart grid’ of the future on which U.S. energy sustainability depends?” Download the white paper at: http://gettingsmarteraboutthesmartgrid.org/ .
 
‘Smart meter’ contractor, city of Port Angeles settle on failed project http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/article/20141023/NEWS/310239993
‘Smart meter’ contractor, city of Port Angeles settle on failed project. (October 22, 2104)
City Settles Smart Meter Conflict (Port Angeles)  http://portocallpublishing.com/2014/10/city-settles-smart-meter-conflict/  “City “Made Whole” in Terminating Smart Meter Contract.”  (October, 2014).         
 

Direct Testimony of Maximilian Chang On Behalf of Maryland Office of People’s Counsel, February 8, 2016BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND.  (Economic assessment of Baltimore Electric’s rate increase requests and justifications.  In part the rate increase is due to their AMI smart meter program now in it’s fifth year.  This testimony further details a number of the “greenwashing” points of AMI that Safe Utility Meters Alliance NW (SUMA-NW) has  brought up to Seattle City Council members,). Chang Public – FINAL

Comments of Public Service Company of New Hampshire DBA Eversource Energy, before the State of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission.  This is a succinct presentation of implementing a modernized electric grid without AMI. 15-296 2015-09-17 EVERSOURCE COMMENT
 
Assessing the Prevalence of Bias in Studies Showing Savings Linked to Energy Consumption Feedback (Part 1)
“Key Article Point: Based upon the positive biases that are inherent in energy consumption feedback studies, there is considerable doubt on the validity of
 estimates that smart meters can deliver the promised energy savings.”
 
Smart Meter Deployments: Based upon Biased and False Assumptions for Providing Eco-Feedback to Consumers (Part 2)  https://smartgridawareness.org/2016/06/05/smart-meter-deployments-based-on-biased-and-false-assumptions/
“What if the billions and billions of dollars being spent to deploy so-called “smart meters” were found to be justified based upon biased and false assumptions?  Should consumers still be required to pay for smart meters that were erroneously promoted as being installed for their benefit, i.e., to help them manage their energy bills? This article will demonstrate that based upon the latest research and under the most optimistic circumstances, consumers within the general population might reduce their energy consumption by only as much as 0.5 to 0.7 % if they have access to enhanced feedback from smart meters.”
“Smart Meters Have a Life of 5 to 7 years.”(Congressional testimony)  https://smartgridawareness.org/2015/10/29/smart-meters-have-life-of-5-to-7-years/
. . .”You can see why I think it is a big deal for a utility executive to mention that the life of a ‘smart’ meter is only 5 to 7 years.  A value of 15 years or more is usually utilized in utility cost-benefit analyses for ‘smart’ meter deployments.”  . . .

 “EMERGING RISK INSIGHTS:” Swiss Reinsurance report.  http://media.swissre.com/documents/SONAR_+Emerging_risk_insights_from_Swiss_Re.pdf    

“If a direct link between EMF and human health problems were established, it would open doors for new claims and could ultimately lead to large losses under product liability covers.  Liability rates would likely rise.”  (Overall impact – High; Time frame >10 years). ”  Quote  taken from page 12 of this 2013 document.  Underwriters advise insurance companies about risk in relation to a product.  They consider exposure to wireless technology (includes smart meters) a leading risk to health greater than health damages caused by GMO’s, damages from fracking, by the re-emergence of asbestos, and nanotechnology. 

Concerns on Advanced Metering Infrastructure.  Sonia Hoglander presenting at The Select Committee on Utility Strategic Planning – 9/18/2014, on behalf of SUMA-NW;   several members of Seattle City Council were attending.  Presentation begins at ~31:20 minutes into the video:   http://www.seattlechannel.org/mayor-and-council/city-council/select-committee-on-utility-strategic-planning?videoid=x28696
SUMA-NW PowerPoint to the Seattle City Council by Sonia M. Hoglander
 
“Smart Meter Remote Disconnect: An ‘Unnecessary Risk’ for Signigicant Damage to the Grid.”  https://smartgridawareness.org/2016/05/12/smart-meter-remote-disconnect-an-unnecessary-risk-for-significant-damage-to-the-grid/  . . . Nick Hunn: “The concern I have is that every smart meter has an isolation switch so it can be remotely connected from the supply. … If somebody could hack into that or just by mistake turn off very large numbers of meters, that sudden shock of taking them off the grid, and even worse be able to turn back on at the same time, would cause significant damage.  And to me that’s an unnecessary risk.” . . . 
 
“Catastrophic Failures Expected with “Smart Meters.”  https://smartgridawareness.org/2015/11/03/catastrophic-failures-expected-with-smart-meters/
‘Smart’ Meters are expected to occasionally fail catastrophically while analog meters do not have that failure mode.  This was the information presented by an industry representative at a recent conference sponsored by the Edison Electric Institute (EEI).